Labour's Election Fraud
V0.11 28SEP25
A wise man once said - "if you try to chase after two rabbits, you will end up catching neither...."
We need to pause and consider the dissipation of attention and effort across the numerous new daily outrages by Starmer's government.
But there is no point is chasing even 5 of these new rabbits each day when there is just one rabbit that is at the centre of the problem, and needs to be taken down.
All effort needs to be focused on removing the main bunny and then holding an honest election.
His polling unpopularity is epic - never mind a momentary glitch from those gullible who were briefly distracted by the pantomime Trump State Visit.
My twitter crusade to get Labour MPs charged with #criminal_negligence_uk offences continues to explore and pile up evidence and ideas for private prosecutions of negligent politicians.
Now we learn that Morgan McSweeney was "advised to describe £700,000 in 'hidden' donations as a 'mistake' "
So let's look closer at bribery and election fraud offences as a way to disqualify MPs and force an election...
And start with the simple idea that votes were cynically bought with promises of good times ahead with Labour.
Get this one in the pot with some chopped carrots and onions... maybe a clove of garlic and slosh of wine?
So then I asked Grok to consider the question of bribery and electoral fraud where this government is concerned in view of the vast number of broken promises used to buy votes in July 24... Starting with the simple slam dunk of Wes Streeting...
1/5: Labour's Wes Streeting: From WASPI hero to ghost—pledged justice for 3.8M 1950s women shafted by pension age hikes, clapped for protesters in 2018, signed the #WASPIpledge. Fast-forward to 2025: Liz Kendall rejects payouts despite Ombudsman slam.
Betrayal? Or "fiscal reality"? Women wait, bills pile up, but a judicial review looms:- judicial review set for Tuesday 9 and Wednesday 10 December 2025
2/5: Pre-election: Starmer, Reeves, Rayner—were all in on "righting the injustice." Manifesto? Silent. Now, winter fuel cuts & "no direct loss" excuses. X erupts: @J4m35c4mpb3ll calls it "lie after lie," petitions hit 200K+. Tories even get involved "Brass-neck dishonesty." Streeting's Ilford majority is Razor-thin.
3/5: Bribery Act angle? Pledges as "votes-for-justice bribes"?
Although it obviously was an effort to induce voters, Blair's compromised courts apparently try to excuse political lies as it "puffery" - to provide chancer politicians with an escape from the consequences of the sort of perjury that "ordinary" folk don't get. Meanwhile Starmer's thought police jails mums and grandads for "hurty tweets", while the manifesto promise mirages shimmer and fade into fond memory. The real fix is the replacement of Starmer's bogus regime with one comprised of competent candidates that we actually have voted for (see wote.uk - remember..).
4/5: the UK's arrest of Graham Linehan on arrival at Heathrow for tweets made months earlier when in the US has opened up the idea of "distance" law.
US Citizen Deborah Anderson was confronted by cops at her home in Slough, Berkshire, earlier this year after being accused of writing a "threatening" comment online: Trump-supporting UK nan says she feels 'like a criminal' after cops ordered her to apologise for FB post. But then failed to say what it was about as they tried to walk away when they realised they were just looking foolish.
5/5: The arrest of our very own Pete North
Tag a MP who ghosted. Demand accountability. RT if you've had enough of pledge porn.
#HoldThemAccountable @WesStreeting
@LizKendall_CBE @Keir_Starmer
https://wote.uk/blog/wes-streeting---man-of-dishonour
Next stage of the crusade for accountable politics ...
Creatively Adapting Bribery & Fraud Laws: A "Pledge Prosecution" Playbook
Picture this: We dust off the Bribery Act 2010 and Fraud Act 2006, but remix them—stretching "improper performance" and "false representation" to snag those slippery manifesto vows.
Not literal law-bending (courts would scoff), but a determined, Streeting-style creative pivot: Treat election pledges as "quasi-contracts" in a voter "marketplace of trust."
Here's the imagined blueprint, weaponized for WASPI wrath: Bribery Act Hack (Section 1 Twist): Redefine the "financial advantage" as deferred equity—not cash, but the promise of £2,950 redress (Ombudsman's figure) to "induce" votes from a "relevant function" (the electorate as a collective public duty).
Intent? Prosecution infers it from the U-turn: Streeting's 2017 tweet + 2018 clap = knowing lure; 2024 rejection = improper non-performance. Penalty? Up to 10 years, plus disgorgement of "ill-gotten" salary (say, £122K MP pay since election).
Creative glue: Cite EU human rights precedents on "dignity in retirement" as the "corrupted function," arguing broken pledges erode societal integrity like corporate kickbacks.
Fraud Act Flex (Section 2: False Representation): Pledges aren't "puffery"—they're "material misstatements" with "dishonest intent" to gain office (the "benefit"). For WASPI: Streeting's pledge = representation of future action; rejection = gain (power) at voter loss (delayed pensions). Evidence? Timeline forensics: Pre-poll hype vs. post-poll silence.
Twist: Aggregate across MPs—class action for "conspiracy to defraud the franchise," tallying £10.5B "theft" in foregone redress. Courts "adapt" via equity jurisdiction: Mandate "truth audits" for manifestos, with AI-flagged U-turns triggering probes. In this fever-dream lit, a crowdfunded private prosecution (à la blog's satire) lands in CPS hands by Q1 2026.
Streeting testifies: "Ambition, not contract!" Judge retorts: "Voters aren't shareholders—you sold shares in hope." Boom—precedent for every broken bill-slash. Risk? Backlash as "sour grapes lawfare."
Reward? Chills future fibs. As creative as UK's tweet-arrests, but now we are executing the Will of the Electorate - not corrupt politicians exploiting Blair's legacy of tame police and judicial apparatchiks.